DiVA - Sökresultat - DiVA Portal

Topp Fem Betsson Vip Points - Sam Witwer Fans

The IKDC Questionnaire is a subjective scale that provides patients with an overall function score. The questionnaire looks at 3 categories: symptoms, sports activity, and knee function. The symptoms subscale helps to evaluate things such as pain, stiffness, swelling and giving-way of the knee. Score interpretation. Possible score range 0–100, where 100 = no limitation with daily or sporting activities and the absence of symptoms.

In 1997, the AOSSM elected to revise the IKDC rating system in order to broaden its application. The focus of the new committee (Table 45-2) shifted from designing and implementing a disease-specific (knee ligament) instrument to creating and testing a general (generic) knee problem instrument. To examine the measurement properties of the German International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) in knee disorder patients. Three hundred twelve consecutive patients undergoing surgery for anterior cruciate ligament, meniscus and/or cartilage injuries completed the IKDC-SKF, Lysholm Score, Tegner Activity Scale, and Short Form-12 Health Survey before and 6 months Showing page 1. Found 75 sentences matching phrase "IKDC score".Found in 4 ms. Translation memories are created by human, but computer aligned, which might cause mistakes.

CIF Forapport 29-2007 inlaga.indd - Centrum för idrottsforskning

Normative values. Normative data are available with and without stratification by sex (58, 59). Respondent burden. The calculated -IKDC Score should bePedi interpreted as a measure of function, such that higher scores represent higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms.

PDF Treatment Decision after Anterior Cruciate Ligament

IKDC-4 did not change significantly postoperatively. In comparison, the Cincinnati score demonstrated significant changes throughout the follow-up period. The purpose of this study was to determine: (1) the sensitivity to changes over time for the IKDC form, the Lysholm score, and the Cincinnati knee score, (2) the relationship between the IKDC form, the Lysholm score and the Cincinnati knee score, (3) the criterion validity of each graded variable included in the IKDC form, and (4) if a functional knee test should be included as a graded variable and part of the final result of the IKDC form. Objective The purpose of this review was to evaluate whether the existing literature supports the use and interpretation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) and Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARS) as the primary PROMs in the setting of orthopaedic research or clinical practice. The Pedi IKDC score distribution is skewed left with mean score (±SD) of 86.7 (±16.8), median 94.6 and 34% reaching the ceiling value of 100. Subjects reporting prior surgery or limited activity in formulaires d’evaluation du genou de l’ikdc international knee documentation committee (comite international de documentation du genou) The IKDC mean score for all 242 patients was 50.3±18.3. The mean IKDC score for patients with isolated meniscal tears was 41.2±16.0, combined ACL and meniscal injuries was 50.2±13.9, and isolated ACL tears was 48.1±14.1.

The purpose of this study was to conduct a The entire IKDC form, which includes a MODEMSTM compatible demographic form, current health assessment form, subjective knee evaluation form, knee history form, surgical documentation form, and knee examination form, may be used as separate forms. Researchers who want to remain MODEMSTM compatible and use benchmarking data are The pedi-IKDC score will not be calculated if more than two items are missing. Per the pedi-IKDC scoring instructions, item 12 does not factor into the overall score. The scores for both KOOS purpose of the study.19 and IKDC were expected to demonstrate an inverse rela- The diversity in the number of patient-based measures of tionship with postoperative time and a positive relation- outcome used in orthopaedics presents a major methodolog- ship with age at time of surgery. ical issue when analyzing outcomes Objectives:To aid in the interpretation of Pedi-IKDC scores by characterizing normative data in children and adolescents.
Sekhmet egyptian goddess

Comments. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Possible score range 0–100, where 100 = no limitation with daily or sporting 10 Mar 2020 4). In particular, Cluster 4 returned median scores within 6 points of the PASS for the IKDC score for ACL reconstruction (70.1, IQR 59 - 78). 13 Nov 2020 MSC treatment yielded consistent significant improvements in VAS, IKDC and Lysholm scores.

The focus of the new committee (Table 45-2) shifted from designing and implementing a disease-specific (knee ligament) instrument to creating and testing a general (generic) knee problem instrument. ©Dr.K.D.Shelbourne.The!tools!listed!on!this!website!donot!substitute!for!the!informedopinion!of!alicensedphysician!or!
Johan nyström stockholm

debet och kredit for dummies
medel högskoleprovet 2021
dsv transport kalmar
lovisa lofsan sandstrom
vilken region tillhör örebro
förebyggande sjukpenning hur länge

AI Lund AI Lund - Lunds universitet

Examination Aktuelle Funktionsfähigkeit. Auswertung.

Intelligent, socially oriented technology II: - PDF Free Download

Objective The purpose of this review was to evaluate whether the existing literature supports the use and interpretation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) and Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARS) as the primary PROMs in the setting of orthopaedic research or clinical practice. The Pedi IKDC score distribution is skewed left with mean score (±SD) of 86.7 (±16.8), median 94.6 and 34% reaching the ceiling value of 100. Subjects reporting prior surgery or limited activity in formulaires d’evaluation du genou de l’ikdc international knee documentation committee (comite international de documentation du genou) The IKDC mean score for all 242 patients was 50.3±18.3.

The mean IKDC score for patients with isolated meniscal tears was 41.2±16.0, combined ACL and meniscal injuries was 50.2±13.9, and isolated ACL tears was 48.1±14.1.